Recap: Day five of the Paxton Impeachment trial

September 12, 2023

When the republicans in the Senate vote to let this crook off the hook, the Texas GOP will change their name from Grand Old Party to the Gang of Pussies.

What more do they need? Witness after witness have testified that Paxton used the office to help a private citizen, Nate Paul. They are all solid. They are all republicans, except for one. Paxton’s attorney’s continue to grasp at straws looking for something to give republicans cover and an excuse to let Paxton go. It isn’t working, or it shouldn’t be working.

Day five had more senior staff members testifying about his continued interference into Nate Paul’s affairs, as well as his own affair. Margaret Moore the former Travis County District Attorney testified about Nate Paul’s wild ass conspiracy concerning judges, FBI agents, and other law enforcement who were out to get him. She and others stated there was no evidence to back his claims. Nothing. Zero. They begged his attorney to provide documents to support his claim and they refused. They called it baseless and urged Paxton to stop pursuing the issue and his mistress. He didn’t listen to him, on both issues.

Unfortunately there is a time limit on testimony. Each side only has a few hours left before the republicans vote to let him off. The attorney Paxton illegally hired should be called. His mistress should be called. Nate Paul should be called. Paul’s attorney should be called. They won’t be. If you are interested you can view every day of the trial at the Senate website. You can also peruse though the 3400 documents provided as evidence here.

Paxton will not be calling any witnesses in his defense because he has none.


Who is running for City Council to represent Clear Lake?

September 11, 2023

Clear Lake hasn’t had a City Council Member living in Clear Lake for many years. I believe the last was Addie Wiseman. That was decades ago. This year is no different.

District E covers Clear Lake and Kingwood areas, connected by a drainage ditch. Literally. Kingwood has more voters than Clear Lake and has been able to elect Council Members from that area. Currently Council Member Dave Martin is from Kingwood and is term limited so we have a chance to elect someone new.

There are two candidates running Martina Lemond Dixon and Fred Flickinger. This office is a non partisan position and we should expect our elected officials to be non partisan and leave their politics at the door. Unfortunately one candidate is an extreme right wing republican. He is self financing his campaign and endorsed by some of the most right wing of the area including CCISD Trustee Scott Bowen, the Texas GOP, Harris County Republican Party, and State Representative “Little Baby” Briscoe Cain. Much like Bowen, he will bring his extreme politics into city council.

Martina Lemond Dixon is also running. Unlike her opponent she has a history of public service. She is also a Republican.  She is the chief executive officer of a small company, Board President of the HumbleISD School Board, Board Secretary of the Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD), and most recently, was appointed Commissioner on the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE). She has a good resume for the office.

We have a choice in Clear Lake between an extremist from Kingwood or a Republican from Kingwood. The choice is ours. The choice is clear.


Recap: Day four of the Paxton Impeachment trial

September 9, 2023

Paxton was warned about Nate Paul over and over again by multiple people. Today the Director of Law Enforcement David Maxwell a 30 year veteran of the Texas Rangers testified. It’s just getting worse for Paxton.

The Texas Tribune has a great recap. Here are my snarky comments.

Once again, the witnesses who testified today are right wing, “conservative”, republicans and they are rock solid. David Maxwell, a veteran of law enforcement, warned Paxton to stay away from Nate Paul. He refused to use the office of the Attorney General to investigate a non profit on behalf of Nate Paul. He testified that Paxton threatened to fire him if he didn’t. He never initiated the investigation and he was eventually fired.

Abbott’s defense once again was grasping at straws trying to nitpick his testimony. It didn’t work or it shouldn’t work. They tried to ask “Yes or No” questions that Maxwell couldn’t answer it was like this:
Defense: Is it dark outside, yes or no.
Maxwell: I can’t see outside.
Defense: OBJECTION! Yes or No!

The witnesses so far are pretty solid. Each have told the same sequence of events. Paxton was warned, by multiple people not to associate with Nate Paul, yet he did it anyway. The witnesses so far are the whistleblowers who eventually went to the FBI and reported Paxton. They were all fired or demoted and eventually filed suit against Paxton.

That suit settled for over $3 Million but the Texas House refused to pay it. More coming Monday.


Who is running for Houston Mayor?

September 8, 2023

And who shouldn’t be running for Houston Mayor?

According to the Click2Houston there are 18 candidates running for Mayor of Houston and 12 shouldn’t be for a number of reasons. Running for Mayor isn’t a game. It requires money, lots of money. It requires experience in some aspect of governing such as prior elected official experience, or maybe experience working with the city, or experience in doing business with the city. With that in mind the only candidates worth considering are:

John WhimireTexas House Member, Texas Senate Member
Sheila Jackson LeeFormer City Council Member, Congresswoman
Lee KaplanBusinessman
Golbert GarciaAttorney, Metro Board
Robert GallegosCity Councilmember
Jack ChristieFormer City Council Member

The rest below should really consider running for something that fits with their skill set. Until then focus on the candidates listed above for Houston Mayor.

Gaylon S. Caldwell
Annie “Mama” Garcia
M. “Griff” Griffin
Naoufal Houjami
B. Ivy
M. J. Khan
David C. Lowy
Julian Bemer Martinez
Chanel Mbala
Kathy Lee Tatum
Roy Vasquez
Robin Williams

Recap: Day three of the Paxton Impeachment trial

September 8, 2023

This is boring me to tears.

The Texas Tribune has a great recap. Here are my snarky comments.

Once again the witnesses for the State were solid, right wing, “conservatives” and the Buzbee Bunch defending Paxton was grasping for straws on minute details hoping to give republican Senators a way to justify saying “I have my doubts”. His attorneys hammered the witnesses, unsuccessfully, on the letterhead that was used to fire an attorney that Paxton hired illegally to intervene in a suit his staff had warned Paxton not to get involved in.

They hammered one of the witnesses for not taking aside the “gentle, kind” Paxton prior to going to the FBI and telling him they were going to the FBI. Those who went to the FBI were later fired, or demoted. They left the office, sued Paxton, and was to receive a $3 Million settlement.

Most of the time I was left with the question “What is your point?”. The witnesses were solid. They gave Paxton multiple opportunities to remove himself from Nat Pauls dealings and lawsuits. He refused so they went to the FBI. Witnesses were hammered, unsuccessfully, about them going to the FBI without evidence of a crime yet they had been for days detailing their concerns. The FBI was to validate the complaint, determine if it has merit, and then investigate. The FBI will find the evidence, not the staff.

The defense is just trying to give republican senators an opportunity to let Paxton off the hook. Any little reason will do. Anything no matter how minute it is.


Recap: Day two of the Paxton Impeachment trial

September 7, 2023

This is just awful. BTW if you want to read a great recap of the day visit The Texas Tribune. Here is my snarky comments on the day.

Paxton is just so screwed. I watched a number of hours of the trial yesterday. I pushed through the cross examination by Tony Buzbee waiting for his spray on tan to start dripping down his face. It didn’t happen. Buzbee attempted to put doubt in the testimony of the witnesses. That also didn’t happen. So far the witnesses are solid, right wing, republican, “federalist”, witnesses. They are telling the story of Paxton being warned over and over again about using the office of the Attorney General to help a donor, Nate Paul which is illegal. Yet he continued to do so.

Lt Governor Dan Patrick, looking like a post turtle, did his best to act like a real judge or lawyer. It didn’t work. (A post turtle is a turtle on top of a fence post. He doesn’t know how he got there. He doesn’t know what to do there. And he doesn’t know how to get off.) It is just awkward. Team Buzbee seems like they never tried a criminal defense case before. Buzbee is a personal injury attorney and he too seems like a post turtle. He didn’t help Paxton with his cross examination. He referred to the witnesses by their first names attempting to get a rise out of them. It didn’t work. They were solid. He wasn’t. The only thing Buzbee did was make the witnesses testimony more credible.

This morning Buzbee will attempt to cross examine another witness. It’s not going to go well.

Day three coming up.


Thank you Bay Area Democratic Movement!

September 6, 2023

I’ve been on the Board of Bay Area Democratic Movement for 6 years. It’s been a pleasure!


Recap: Day one of the Paxton Impeachment trial

September 6, 2023

I got to admit….I didn’t watch all of it.

OMG. Some quick notes on what I did watch/listen to. Paxton’s attorney, Tony Buzbee looks like an overly tanned Ken and he sounds like a civil attorney trying to act like a criminal defense attorney. He isn’t a criminal defense attorney. Even with my law degree from Facebook U I know a thing or two because I’ve seen a thing or two.

For instance they spent 10 minutes on an objection by Buzbee against evidence being presented that the Buzbee team introduced! Seriously. Team Buzbee provided the evidence. Team Harding was presenting this evidence to the jury (The Senate) and Buzbee was objecting to it. To compound this stupidity Lt Governor Patrick, who is presiding over the trial, let this stupidity continue for a full 10 minutes. Patrick isn’t a judge or a lawyer. His only experience is what he learned from Facebook U.

Buzbee on a number of instances objected to testimony on conversations between a witness and Paxton. My attorney friends says it was a case of Lawyering 101, a class Buzbee must have failed.

Only one witness was called. He talked about learning of Paxton’s involvement with Nate Paul (he is the guy Paxton illegally helped in a civil case), something he said was highly irregular for a sitting Attorney General to do. He met with Paxton and claimed Paxton agreed to not interface with Paul again, yet the very next day he did it again.

I’m going to have to watch the cross examination. This witness was pretty good. Clearly he was concerned about the integrity of the Office as well as Paxton’s actions.


Texas Trump Republicans will let Paxton off the hook

September 5, 2023

Count on it.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial starts today. The trial will be televised and all Texans will have the opportunity to see the evidence against Paxton but they won’t. Most don’t care. Neither do the Republicans in the Senate.

If you haven’t been paying attention, their leader, Donald Trump, attempted to black mail the leader of Ukraine. Then he instigated a riot on the United States Capitol. He was impeached twice yet the republicans let him off the hook. Twice. If you think Texas Republicans in the Senate is going to vote to remove Paxton you really haven’t been paying attention.

This isn’t a criminal trial, that will come later. This is a trial to determine if Paxton is honorable enough to hold the office of top attorney. “Honorable” means nothing to republicans. Absolutely nothing. Evidence that will be provided will show Paxton had an affair and shared privileged information with a friend, Nate Paul, who moved his mistress to Austin. He hired an unqualified attorney from Houston, a referral from Nate Paul, to investigate a non-profit who was in litigation with Paul. That attorney issued 29 subpoenas and identified himself as a “Special Prosecutor”. Paxton’s staff squashed the subpoenas and ended the contract with the attorney.

The fact that he had an affair, compromised his position as lead attorney, and lied about it to his wife, a fellow Senator, would have been enough for Republicans to throw his rotten ass out the door. But that was prior to Trump. That was when Republicans actually were “conservative”, honorable, and moral.

Today the Republican Party leaders are just a bunch of low life, lying, cheating, stealing, adulterer sympathizer, excuse making, rotten bunch of fucking bastards. They will let Paxton off.

Count on it. You can watch the Republican Party crap itself live on the Senate website.


Fox 26 Houston airs Rumor Central. Will fire reporter.

September 4, 2023

This isn’t journalism.

Fox 26 aired a piece by Greg Groogan about a”rumor” that Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo was going to resign. Needless to say it was a baseless rumor started by an undisclosed individual. Usually TV station management would refuse to air a story based upon baseless rumors. If not any idiot journalist would have a great story every single day.

Groogan has a history of pissing on a campfire. He seems to enjoy it. Maybe someone ought to air a story based upon baseless rumors from a very reputable source: Fox 26 will fire Greg Groogan for his story about a baseless rumor. How is that for journalism? Maybe I can take over for Greg.

Dear Greg. Do better.