Day Three of the Lowry Trial. The Verdict is in!

June 17, 2026

Both Ross and Yancy lost.

When a jury renders their decision we respect it. (Unless you are a republican) We may not like it but we respect it and move on. Overall Ross had a very difficult threshold to get a decision based upon the instructions given by the Judge. Yancy on the other hand lost due to a technicality.

Her case was a violation of a settlement between Lowry and her in 2023. He agreed not to harass her anymore yet did it anyway. Unfortunately according to the settlement, called a “Rule 11”, she had to alert Lowry to stop harassing her 14 days prior to filing suit. The evidence that was presented wasn’t enough for the Judge or the jury. Did Lowry harass Yancy, her sons, her husband, and her Church? If you have kept up with Lowry you can make that decision yourself. I thought it was pretty clear.

Now if Lowry continues to harass Yancy she can alert him 14 days before filing suit. Again. Maybe since Lowry’s attorneys based their entire case on the Rule 11, that they introduced, Lowry will think twice before harassing Yancy again.

Maybe someone needs to copy all the evidence presented to the jury and post it for all to see.


Day Three of the Lowry Trial. The Verdict

June 17, 2026

Closing arguments start at 1:00. I am assuming the jury will get the case today and it will be over. I just can’t understand how someone, anyone, especially an elected official would stoop so low to harass someone, their family, their church, and others in the community. It is just mind boggling to me. Just to remind you of just one incident, here is someone speaking at a recent city council meeting concerning the harassment his family endured. Ask yourself why would anyone do this?


Day Two of the Lowry Trial. Lowry Takes the Stand

June 16, 2026

Today had some drama and Lowry taking the stand. Here are my notes. It was a long day.

  • Drama. Lowry eventually showed up after lunch. Harvey Freebird recorded him in the hall. The judge heard of this and asked Harvey to approach the bench. She claimed that no pictures or video were allowed in the hall. (I did not know that. The signs say no cameras in the courtroom) She just asked Harvey to delete the video or be held in contempt of court. Harvey apologized and deleted the video.
  • More Drama. Lowry must have whined to the judge about Harvey calling him a “piece of shit”. Harvey denied it but said he had it on video that he just deleted. Nevertheless she asked Harvey to leave the courtroom because he was disrupting. He left.
  • Even More Drama. A reporter asked to approach the bench and admitted she too took pictures in the hall. The Judge asked her to just delete the pictures and that was it.
  • Back to the trial. A video of Lowry calling her sons “Yancy Boys” and “Drug dealers” was admitted into evidence. I am not sure when that will be played.
  • Lowry’s attorneys tried to set up a timeframe repeatedly trying to make it seem like Lowry was actually the victim. (I couldn’t follow his logic but that theme was repeated later.)
  • The Judge removed the jury to discuss a comment made by Yancy’s past history. It almost resulted in a mistrial but both attorneys resolved the matter and we moved on.
  • Rule 11 was, again, talked about. Back in 2002 Yancy sued for a Temporary Restraining Order against Lowry. In 2023 they both agreed to a Rule 11 where both agreed not to harass each other, in general, even though there was only one party doing the harassing.
  • The next day an article was written in the Galveston Daily News which the attorney claimed was Yancy violating that agreement. Yancy didn’t. Anyone who read the article could see that she made very general comments about good governing. This will be back later.
  • Lowry’s lawyers kept asking her if she spoke to The Guardian, or The Defender, or other media. What she told The Defender was general comments about MAGA.

Ross takes the stand

  • James Ross was a City Councilman.
  • Retired Navy
  • Lives in La Marque and taught culinary
  • VFW Volunteer
  • Volunteered with the City on ordinance updates
  • He attempted to open a Lego store in La Marque
  • Claims investors dropped off because of the chaos in La Marque caused by Lowry
  • Claims Lowry Doxxed him, posting his personal information on the net
  • Lowry posted that people should call the Sheriff to perform a wellness check due to Ross’s mental health issues. The attorney showed that post.
  • Claims he received unwarranted phone calls after Lowry would post about him
  • Showed a post by Lowry stating about Ross “He is a scumbag who hurts women”
  • Claimed that Lowry said Ross was taking bribes, and tax payer money for his Lego store
  • Showed a pic of Lowry driving around with an AK Pistol and a 5% hat
  • Ross for safety reasons put up cameras around his house
  • He filed 3 police reports on Lowry
  • Claims that people constantly ask about his alleged illegal activity
  • Makes him feel embarrassed and hurt especially at the VFW
  • Lowry’s attorney claims public officials are open to criticism
  • Ross states in long drawn out mode that there is a line when someone accuses you of breaking the law
  • Lawyer tries to claim that Ross and Yancy conspired together to join the lawsuit against Lowry
  • Ross claims nothing of the sort happened. Their cases are different, and they are.

CJ Beard takes the stand

  • CJ describes his past, working for a Congressman, Owns a home building company, Has a BA from UH and a Masters from TSU.
  • Used Lowry’s company to pump concrete for his foundations
  • Stopped at one time
  • Lowry sent an email to his Mom, “Momma Rose” telling her to look out, or be careful or something like that
  • That was the beginning of Beard taking Lowry seriously
  • Lowry said something at an elementary school function claiming Beard was a “thug” and a “crooked thief”
  • Claims Lowry visited his construction sites making racial comments
  • Attorneys asked if he referred to Lowry as a No Neck Racist
  • Admitted to being charged with filing a false police report but all charges were dropped.

Lowry takes the stand

  • Lowry had short simple answers such as no sir, yes sir, I don’t remember, I don’t know, I don’t recall, and “I don’t know what your are talking about”
  • Lowry claims he is the victim with Yancy posting hundreds of harassing comments
  • Admits he was the defendant when Yancy filed a Temporary Restraining Order against him which lead to the Rule 11
  • Claims Yancy “ran” to the newspapers the very next day but had no proof
  • Claims someone at the paper told him (I thought that was hearsay?)
  • Claims that Yancy “knows” people at the paper
  • Claims she broke the Rule 11 agreement when talking to the paper. (Not true. Go read the article)
  • Attorneys hammered the “This rule applies to both” arguments (Even though Yancy was not harassing Lowry)
  • According to the agreement Yancy was to contact Lowry if he violated the agreement
  • Lowry claims he is not a racist
  • Claims he has been harassed hundreds of time
  • Claims this has impacted his business
  • Claims he had to move his kids to private school
  • Also claims he was “surrounded” by Yancy supporters in the parking lot. The Judge didn’t seem to care.
  • On Cross Yancy’s attorney asked about Michelle Smith. Lowry claims she is an anonymous person posting. No one asked where she was posting or when or what she posted.
  • Claims he made money from his first Lowry News Network on Facebook. That was removed.
  • Acknowledged that he claimed Ross was a pedophile even though he has no proof
  • Lowry claims it is because he was a 55 year old man wanting to open a lego store. (Legos are not just for kids. There are legos that costs hundreds of dollars.)
  • Admits to posting of Ross’s personal information on the web
  • Lowry was asked if he recalls a email from the City Manager asking Lowry to stop posting pictures of Yancy and her family online. Of course Lowry said “I don’t recall” or one of the phrases.
  • The attorney brought out the email to refresh his memory. After a discussion between the attorneys and judge the email was put into evidence.
  • He eventually had to acknowledge it
  • Lowry was then asked about his own deposition which he could not remember. The part he didnt remember was the following which he “disregarded everything involving that Chapter 11”

I left early at around 4:45. I believe the trial will continue tomorrow.


La Marque Councilman a No Show at Trial, Posts Racist Message

June 15, 2026

I hate the State for it’s lack of protection for the common man.

La Marque City Councilman Joseph Lowry, AKA Chicken Little, chickened out on trial today. Lowry is being sued for harassment and other counts by Councilwoman Kimberly and former Councilman James Ross. Lowry didn’t show up and isn’t expected to show up leaving his attorneys, multiple, to carry his jock strap. He re-post the post to the right just a few days ago. It is clearly racist, using the N word, and comparing Blacks to “nappy headed future watermelon felons”. It is disgusting. Anyone who would post this would be fired.

Today there were a number of discussions in the morning with jury selection in the afternoon. The trial started at 2:00 PM with the first witness, Kimberly Yancy testifying till the end of the day. She is expected to return to the stand in the morning. Here are some notes I took.

  • Yancy’s attorney laid out his case. It is about emotional distress, harassment, stalking, and mental anguish.
  • Lowry’s attorney put up 3 post by Lowry claiming “This is why we are here” and it’s all about free speech protected by the first amendment of the Constitution.
  • Under testimony Yancy said there are 600 documented cases of harassment by Lowry
  • Including harassment of her, her husband, her children, the school she worked at and even her church
  • She filed a suit against Lowry in 2022 for a Temporary Restraining Order
  • That suit was settled with an agreement between the two to not harass each other, personally, or online.
  • Lowry has since violated that agreement
  • She has never had to deal with harrassment
  • She (they) bought a firearm for protection, they never had one before or the need to have one
  • Yancy mentioned her and her family being called thugs, ghetto ass, and lowry vowing to put her in prison
  • Claims Lowry has doxed her, posting her SSN, address, and other personal information
  • Claims that her kids were invited to dinner by Lowry to break bread (my words) It did not go well
  • Called her kids pedophiles
  • He created a Facebook page about her
  • Says it was the most demeaning time in her life

Lowry’s attorney crossed examined her immediately raising his voice attacking.

  • Claims Yancy referred to Lowry as a KKK member.
  • Attacking Yancy for not contacting Lowry prior to filing suit
  • Claimed Yancy told kids at her school that Lowry killed her dog. Yancy said the students (high school) asked her if it was true that Lowry posted a video claiming this.
  • The attorneys seemed to be grasping at straws looking for a technical issue to squash the case.

Tomorrow Yancy will finish and I expect James Ross to take the stand. His case is about harassment also. That should be interesting. The trial starts tomorrow at 10:15.


Visitor Instructions for La Marque Councilman’s Trial on Monday June 15

June 14, 2026

If you are going to go to La Marque City Councilman Joseph Lowry’s trial tomorrow here are a few tips. Visit this page to get updates on the trial. You never know what can happen that would result in a postponement.

The Case # is 24-CV-2218 | Walter Burt, Et Al vs. Joseph Lowry. It is being held in the 212th District Court, with Judge Grady, Patricia. The court is located at 600 59th St Galveston, TX 77551 in the relatively new Justice Center. The case begins at 9:00AM with jury selection, as I have been told. Parking is free. Expect to go through security checks.

Please respect the court. No loud talking. No talking in front of the doors of the court. NO CAMERAS or taking pictures of the court whether you are inside or not. (Ask me about my personal experience) No outbursts. Of course, silence your cell phones.

Hopefully the trial will start immediately after the jury selection and we can have a drink at a local restaurant later that day.


La Marque’s Runoff, and Who They Ran Off

May 6, 2026

City Councilman Joe Compian and his challenger Sade Williams will be in a run off for La Marque City Council District B. Both received 56 votes. The runoff will be sometime in June. Compian, a sitting Councilman, only received 35% of the vote with 65% of all voters supporting someone else. The next election will be between two candidates, not four. This should concern Compian. If I was going to advise Compian I would tell him to put some distance between himself and Councilman Lowry. As I have said in the past Lowry and his wife are as popular as herpes at a hot tub party. Speaking of his wife…

La Marque has a runoff in June, but on May 2 voters ran off Sarah Lowry, the wife of Councilman Joseph Lowry. Lowry was a candidate for District D and was crushed by 53 points with 55 voters in District D voting for her. 55?!?!? Really? Getting runoff by 53 points is sad but getting 55 votes for someone with the baggage of her husband’s child like attitude is really sad!

But the good news is that Tonia Griffin returns to Council. Good luck to Compian and Williams in the runoff.


La Marque Councilman Caught on Camera. Again

May 1, 2026

It’s Joseph Lowry. Again in an expletive exchange with a citizen.

You can watch the videos of Lowry and his wife approaching Harvey Freebird, a 1st Amendment Auditor. Decide for yourself if this man and wife are worthy of being elected officials. Joseph is currently on city council. His wife is running for council. That election is May 2. She puts her two cents in the third video. This is not the first time he was recorded spewing profanity. Actually this isn’t even the second time. It is his third. From Galveston County Daily News:

Some on city council say Councilman Joseph Lowry failed to embody the spirit of his constituents Monday night when he was caught on camera hurling insults, obscene gestures and threatening to fight a man who was recording police at a crash scene.

He then attacked a reporter from the Houston Chronicle after being questioned about $43,000 in back taxes that he failed to pay. He eventually paid most of his taxes but he has been sued again for back taxes, case # 26-TX-0085.

“I don’t owe anybody any money,” councilman Joseph Lowry said to the Galveston County Daily News. “But good job. You’re a piece of s—. You’re a f—— maggot. And you’ll get what’s coming to you.”

And once again, he has been caught on video. These are posted to Facebook:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:


Another Impersonation Concerning La Marque City Councilman

April 30, 2026

BTW. Lowry does NOT like people who impersonate others online such as Derrick Miller in Texas City who was charged with creating a fake Joseph Lowry Facebook page. All charges were eventually dropped. Let’s connect some dots.

Filing fake DBA’s. In October of 2025 I wrote “La Marque Councilman Files Suspicious DBAs” about Joseph Lowry filing an official county document “Assumed Name Record Certificate of Ownership for Unincorporated Business or Profession”, in other words, a DBA (Doing Business As). He filed two DBA’s. One under K Yancy (as in Councilman Kimberly Yancy) and one under M Salazar (as in Mandalynn Salazar). He filed both of these on 2/24/22. Lowry has a history of harassing both of these individuals.

Filing a Tax Rollback petition and PAC. In early 2022 Lowry filed a tax rollback petition. Also during that time an employee of his, Sarah Daugherty, now his wife, created a Political Action Committee titled Galveston County Connects PAC (Filer ID 00086188) to raise money for the rollback effort. What is interesting is that Mandalynn Salazar had created a Facebook page conveniently titled Galveston County Connects in June of 2019. It seems that Lowry did this on purpose to hijack her page.

Raising Money. During the tax recall drive Galveston County Connects PAC raised about $11,000. $5000 came from MSW Investment Group and $5,000 came from former Council Member Robert Michetich. Filing DBA’s with someone else’s name and without the consent of the individual is against the law. Intentionally or knowingly filing a fraudulent official document with the county is against the law. (see pic to the left) Salazar filed a complaint with the police concerning the fraudulent DBA.

Using the DBAs of K Yancy and/or M Salazar to raise money is against the law. Creating a PAC that just so happens to look like an active Facebook page to raise money may be cute, and funny, but coupled with the above, might be quite interesting to County Officials. What it looks like is that Lowry was attempting to confuse voters claiming K Yancy, M Salazar, and Salazar’s Facebook group was in support of the tax rollback. Is that legal?


A Vote of No Chaos in La Marque

April 26, 2026

Come on La Marque voters. You are better than this.

There are two City Council Members up for reelection, Council Members Joe Compian and Tonia Griffin. Compian is challenged by Felix Brown, Jody Richards, and Sade Williamsby. Council Member Griffin is being challenged by Sarah Lowry, yes, that Sarah Lowry, bride of Chucky Council Member Joseph Lowry.

As of today only Griffin has filed a campaign finance report. Those reports are posted on the La Marque website. Reports are required even if you are self financing. There are few exceptions for not filing.

Lowry hasn’t filed but has spent money on some of the worst campaign signs ever made in direct violation of Campaign Signs 101. Besides have a gawd awful sign the citizens of La Marque need stability and restored faith in their government. Lowry will just bring more chaos to the Council sitting next to her fucked up husband, Joseph Lowry. Joseph should be run out of office and Sarah should not be running for office. Both are not qualified to represent the citizens of La Marque and both are just filthy human beings. Her running on god, faith, and family is just fucked up.

La Marque, you can do better. Don’t fuel the chaos. Elect an adult.


LaMarque Councilman Goes to Trial Monday 3/23 in Harris County

March 22, 2026

Anyone want to attend? Harris County Civil Courthouse 333rd Court 201 Caroline St 14th floor, Houston, TX 77002. I would expect the first day will be for seating a jury and other overhead. (I’ll find out more tomorrow)

The Civil Case #202107817 TOMCZAK, MARTIN vs. SIX BROTHERS CONCRETE PUMPING LLC filed in Harris County  concerns a non compete clause signed by Martin Tomczak. According to the court documents Martin claims Lowry threatened him and potential employers with lawsuits based upon this non compete document leaving Tomczak unemployed. One of the documents submitted to the court is a list of texts and correspondence from Lowry. You can read the entire 27 pages here